|
Post by Atlantico Norte on May 10, 2006 18:47:27 GMT -5
I agree with you Gnid... that was only my suggestion... in fact that was just a matter a matter of putting it in a different way... anyhow I guess that it's best for us to use % instead of fractions. If Ness allows me I will check that again to change to % to make it easy for everyone to endersteand. Are you ok with that nessie?
|
|
|
Post by Ness Snorlaxia on May 10, 2006 18:49:12 GMT -5
I'm OK with it.
|
|
|
Post by Atlantico Norte on May 10, 2006 19:00:10 GMT -5
I will try to do a little later... I will try to make it sound as nice as possible... anyhow... I would ask for your help and Gnid's help to put it in a proper english.
|
|
|
Post by Ness Snorlaxia on May 10, 2006 20:57:41 GMT -5
I suggest waiting until the base law is implemented and made official, before rewording the law. The current revision has all FOR votes.
How does ending voting for this law at midnight Eastern Daylight Time (GMT -5) tomorrow, if agreed upon and no other major changes are made, sound?
|
|
|
Post by Gnidrah on May 10, 2006 21:04:58 GMT -5
Sounds good, to me.
|
|
|
Post by wrathfulpeople on May 10, 2006 21:35:14 GMT -5
I have not seen any other members vote for this law, but I also agree with it and the revisions with percentages instead of fractions.
*Does not want to stay up for three days straight trying to explain to EMC how to do the math*
|
|
|
Post by Ness Snorlaxia on May 10, 2006 21:36:11 GMT -5
Look at the bottom part of Page 5 for the most recent revision, and approvals/votes FOR.
|
|
|
Post by Atlantico Norte on May 11, 2006 6:55:36 GMT -5
I vote for too
|
|
|
Post by Springfield and Zara on May 11, 2006 9:18:28 GMT -5
I'm against any kind of limits in number of endorsments one can receive. It's, basicly, nothing but introducing a dictatorship and UN delegacy for life.
Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against Ness' delegacy, but if we want to work on furtherment of democracy in Hyrule, this act should never be in power.
I believe we shouldn't work on consequences, but to introduce rules of giving endorsments to other nations, instead.
|
|
|
Post by Atlantico Norte on May 11, 2006 9:33:22 GMT -5
Well... By the way... Nessie... when is the next votings for the UN delegacy?
|
|
|
Post by tasmanyaya on May 11, 2006 9:53:32 GMT -5
I'm For.
|
|
|
Post by eternalmoonchild on May 11, 2006 10:41:45 GMT -5
Thank you Wrathful People but Tasman already said she would help me with the math *Looks puzzled* Anyway, I am hoping this time, everyone approves and I can post it
|
|
|
Post by Ness Snorlaxia on May 11, 2006 14:52:37 GMT -5
I'm against any kind of limits in number of endorsments one can receive. It's, basicly, nothing but introducing a dictatorship and UN delegacy for life. Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against Ness' delegacy, but if we want to work on furtherment of democracy in Hyrule, this act should never be in power. I believe we shouldn't work on consequences, but to introduce rules of giving endorsments to other nations, instead. The main reason a law like this is needed is that the region's founder is inactive. In the past, I have recieved a TG from a nation that said that there are some raider groups who would like to invade, and we don't really want that to happen. Even though Hyrule is large, there are some regions which have a lot of invader nations, or will use certain tricks to try and seize the delegacy. There is another option, refounding the region so it has an active founder, but that could take a month or two for it to be complete.
|
|
|
Post by wrathfulpeople on May 11, 2006 15:07:07 GMT -5
who would be founder and what would thier responsibilities be?
|
|
|
Post by Kritschboilek on May 12, 2006 3:25:29 GMT -5
It would be quite harsh to refound this region with all of it's 418 nations ... :morevomit: :vomit: :selfinjury: :selfinjury: :cucumber: :carrot: :mxiribita: :inlove: :fxiribita: :sportscar: :jumpyjumpy: :tank: :jackson: :harp: :couch: :dwarf: :dwarf: :dwarf: :getimage:
|
|