|
Post by Atlantico Norte on Mar 27, 2007 2:35:05 GMT -5
Repeal "UN Patent Law" A proposal to repeal a previously passed resolution
Description: UN Resolution #156: UN Patent Law (Category: Free Trade; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.
Argument: RECOGNISING the desirability of harmonising international patent regulations; however,
CONVINCED that the harm of a patent should not be greater than the corresponding public benefit; and,
CONCERNED by the failure of the UN Patent Law to provide exceptions for vitally important items, such as lifesaving medicines, which has caused lives to be lost due to the unaffordability of patented medicines and the constraining of UN member nations from independently carrying out the production of such medicines; and,
BELIEVING that the international patent system contains inherent flaws, that it poses impediments to the welfare of the people of the world and to economic efficiency, that other incentive systems besides monopoly profits are possible, and hence that it should not be uncompromisingly enforced upon the world;
NOW THEREFORE, the United Nations, in council assembled,
ABOLISHES the United Nations Patent Registry; and,
REPEALS Resolution 156, "UN Patent Law".
Voting Ends: 00:00GMT Thu Mar 29 2007
|
|
|
Post by Kritschboilek on Mar 27, 2007 5:52:10 GMT -5
Beer.
|
|
|
Post by stargatesg1 on Mar 27, 2007 8:22:52 GMT -5
For
|
|
|
Post by Jerry Christ on Mar 27, 2007 13:40:44 GMT -5
FOR
|
|
|
Post by highpomegrenade on Mar 27, 2007 17:13:39 GMT -5
AGAINST
|
|
|
Post by Atlantico Norte on Mar 29, 2007 19:16:51 GMT -5
Krit: 1 For: 2 Against: 1
Hyrule will vote for
|
|
|
Post by Kritschboilek on Mar 30, 2007 7:59:16 GMT -5
Uh oh wait a minute!
2 FOR 2 AGAINST ==> ABSTAIN ????
|
|
|
Post by Atlantico Norte on Mar 30, 2007 9:32:18 GMT -5
? what?
|
|
|
Post by Atlantico Norte on Mar 30, 2007 9:34:09 GMT -5
yes if there was a tie Hyrule would abstain... But you can't change your vote now because the voting period has expired.
|
|
|
Post by Kritschboilek on Mar 31, 2007 11:58:08 GMT -5
How, not a tie? I didn't change my vote, did I? *confused*
|
|
|
Post by Ness Snorlaxia on Mar 31, 2007 13:31:56 GMT -5
AN, when Krits makes those random posts, he means to count it as an "Against" vote, just to clarify.
|
|
|
Post by Porcu on Mar 31, 2007 22:07:02 GMT -5
It seems our young delegate still has many things to learn Krit's post was brilliant, btw...
|
|
|
Post by Atlantico Norte on Mar 31, 2007 23:11:29 GMT -5
Well I'm sorry but I thought that when someone doesn't say for, against or abstain... is making a null vote... so I appreciate that to avoid this kind of confusions that (if possible) only those words are used on votings and any other will not be taken in account.
|
|