|
|
Post by South Malaysia on Jan 3, 2007 19:41:01 GMT -5
Atlantico Norte:  South Malaysia: 
This would be considered a constitutional amendment therefore requiring 2/3 of a vote. |
|
|
|
Post by Porcu on Jan 6, 2007 22:58:14 GMT -5
Will this be like a process of elimination type of thing, where two flags are put up and slowly we narrow it down to the last two?
|
|
|
|
Post by Ness Snorlaxia on Jan 6, 2007 23:09:36 GMT -5
That can be done, but the intention was for two flags out of the four proposed to be selected by the RFC and be voted on, and whatever the winner is will become the flag. I'll have to talk to EM and Stargate about it and see how they feel.
|
|
|
|
Post by Porcu on Jan 6, 2007 23:16:37 GMT -5
Oh...I didn't mean to mess anything up, but I personally liked your simple flag best, but I already voted assuming that another process was in place. Sorry...
|
|
|
|
Post by Ness Snorlaxia on Jan 6, 2007 23:22:55 GMT -5
It's okay, no worries.  |
|
|
|
Post by Robengrad on Jan 7, 2007 19:36:05 GMT -5
Firstly, how on Earth is this a constitutional ammendment, secondly who in the name of all that is Holy puts an abstain option on a choice of two poll and thirdly, and most importantly of all why oh why oh why would anyone then bother to vote to abstain? Abstaining is not voting, by clicking that little button you are by definition voting.
Yes I am turning into Dr. Cox from Scrubs.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jerry Christ on Jan 7, 2007 20:18:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Ness Snorlaxia on Jan 7, 2007 20:30:10 GMT -5
JC does have a good point.  |
|
|
|
Post by Porcu on Jan 8, 2007 15:22:54 GMT -5
:peekaboo: Is it over yet?
|
|
|
|
Post by South Malaysia on Jan 8, 2007 19:07:54 GMT -5
I wish it was, but it is at a stalemate really; perhaps we need to go back to the drawing boards...deffly gotta do something that's for sure.
|
|
|
|
Post by stargatesg1 on Jan 9, 2007 19:17:50 GMT -5
try some more I guess.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ness Snorlaxia on Jan 9, 2007 22:09:53 GMT -5
I've proposed a new idea in the RFC thread.
|
|
